Skip to main content

🎯 Budget Allocation Framework: Brand vs Non-Brand vs Defense (Amazon PPC Guide)

A practical Amazon PPC budget framework explaining how to allocate spend across Brand, Non-Brand, and Defense campaigns to reduce waste, protect branded traffic, and scale profitably.

Denis avatar
Written by Denis
Updated yesterday

🧭 Overview

Budget allocation is one of the most criticalβ€”and most misunderstoodβ€”parts of Amazon PPC success. This guide explains how to structure and distribute your ad budget across Brand, Non-Brand, and Defense campaigns to scale profitably without waste.

▢️ Watch: PPC Budget Allocation Explained in 60 Seconds


πŸ‘€ Who This Is For

This guide is ideal for:

  • πŸ†• New Amazon sellers setting up PPC and unsure where to spend first

  • πŸ“ˆ Growing brands dealing with rising ad spend and uneven results

  • πŸ›‘οΈ Established sellers protecting branded traffic from competitors

  • 🧠 Sellers who want predictable, scalable PPC performance


🧩 Key Concepts You Need to Know

  • 🏷️ Brand Keywords
    Search terms containing your brand or product names.

  • πŸ” Non-Brand Keywords
    Generic or competitor terms used by shoppers still comparing options.

  • πŸ›‘οΈ Defense Campaigns
    Campaigns designed to block competitors from capturing your branded traffic.

  • πŸ“Š TACoS (Total Advertising Cost of Sales)
    Ad spend divided by total revenueβ€”used to measure long-term efficiency.

  • πŸ“„ Search Term Report
    Shows the actual customer queries that triggered your ads.


πŸ› οΈ Step-by-Step Budget Allocation Framework

1️⃣ Separate Campaigns by Intent (Non-Negotiable)

Create three distinct campaign groups:

  • 🏷️ Brand Campaigns

    • Your brand keywords and branded ASINs

    • Goal: High conversion, low CPC traffic

  • πŸ” Non-Brand Campaigns

    • Generic, category, and competitor targeting

    • Goal: New customer acquisition

  • πŸ›‘οΈ Defense Campaigns

    • Exact-match brand keywords and branded ASINs

    • Goal: Protect branded search results

⚠️ Common Pitfall: Mixing brand and non-brand keywords in one campaign hides performance data.


2️⃣ Allocate Budget by Business Stage

Use this as a starting framework:

  • πŸ†• Launch Stage

    • πŸ” Non-Brand: 60–70%

    • 🏷️ Brand: 20–30%

    • πŸ›‘οΈ Defense: ~10%

  • πŸ“ˆ Growing Brand

    • πŸ” Non-Brand: 50–60%

    • 🏷️ Brand: 25–35%

    • πŸ›‘οΈ Defense: 10–15%

  • πŸ† Established Brand

    • πŸ” Non-Brand: 40–50%

    • 🏷️ Brand: 30–40%

    • πŸ›‘οΈ Defense: 15–20%

πŸ’‘ Pro Tip: Base budget splits on brand demand maturity, not revenue alone.


3️⃣ Protect Brand & Defense First

Always fully fund Brand and Defense campaigns before scaling Non-Brand.

Why this matters:

  • βœ… Higher Conversion Rates

  • πŸ’° Lower CPCs

  • 🚫 Prevents competitors from stealing brand traffic

Action Checklist:

  • Ensure campaigns never show β€œLimited by budget”

  • Use Exact Match for Defense brand keywords


4️⃣ Scale Non-Brand with Controls

Non-Brand is where most budget waste happens.

Best practices:

  • ⬆️ Increase budgets only on keywords with stable ACoS

  • 🧹 Regularly add negative keywords from Search Term Reports

  • πŸ—“οΈ Scale budgets weekly, not daily

πŸ’‘ Pro Tip: Treat Non-Brand as a controlled growth lever, not a spending engine.


5️⃣ Rebalance Monthly Using Data

At least once per month, review:

  • πŸ“Š Spend share vs revenue share

  • πŸ“‰ TACoS trends

  • πŸ“ˆ Contribution to organic growth

⚠️ Common Pitfall: Chasing the lowest ACoS instead of profitable scale.


🌍 Real-World Examples

Example 1: Growing Private Label Brand

  • πŸ“¦ 2-year seller with rising spend, flat revenue

  • πŸ”§ Separated Brand and Non-Brand campaigns

  • πŸ“‰ Reduced waste via negatives

  • βœ… Result: 18% lower TACoS, higher brand revenue

Example 2: Established Brand Under Attack

  • πŸ† 7-figure brand

  • 🚨 Competitors bidding on brand terms

  • πŸ›‘οΈ Launched Defense campaign with exact match

  • βœ… Result: Lower CPCs, stronger brand dominance


🚫 Common Mistakes to Avoid

  1. ❌ Overspending on Non-Brand too early

    • Fix: Prove Brand & Defense efficiency first

  2. ❌ Ignoring Defense campaigns

    • Fix: Always defend branded demand

  3. ❌ One budget pool for all campaigns

    • Fix: Segment by intent

  4. ❌ Optimizing only for ACoS

    • Fix: Use TACoS and total revenue impact


βœ… Expected Results

After applying this framework, sellers typically see:

  • πŸ“‰ Reduced wasted ad spend

  • πŸ“ˆ More stable growth

  • πŸ›‘οΈ Stronger brand protection

  • πŸ”„ Easier scaling with fewer surprises


❓ FAQs

How much should I spend on brand keywords?
Enough to ensure brand campaigns never go out of budget.

Do small sellers need Defense campaigns?
Yesβ€”brand demand attracts competitors at any size.

Should I pause Non-Brand if ACoS is high?
Not automatically. Evaluate TACoS and ranking impact.

How often should budgets be rebalanced?
Monthly for most sellers; bi-weekly for high-volume accounts.


To help you apply this framework consistently, use the Amazon PPC Budget Allocation Checklist (Brand vs Non-Brand vs Defense).


It’s designed for monthly reviews and pre-scaling budget checks inside Amazon Ads.

Did this answer your question?